Monday, December 28, 2009

Is Accelerated Reader really a good idea?

Accelerated Reader says it “guide[s] students to the right books.” It is “a ‘reading management’ software system that helps teachers track student reading through computerized comprehension tests and awards students points for books they read based on length and difficulty, as measured by a scientifically researched readability rating.” Sounds good, right? But one author who is also a mom looked closer. The fifth installment of the Gossip Girl series, I Like It Like That is given 8 points - which means it’s worth more than Hamlet (7 points). The author’s daughter pointed out that if students really wanted to get a lot of points, they should read Harry Potter. The Order of the Phoenix was worth 44 points. Another daughter, in an Advanced Placement class, was reading Frankenstein (17 points), The Remains of the Day (13 points), Heart of Darkness (10 points). Notice how together they don’t add up to the Order of the Phoenix? Teacher says kids often won’t read books that aren’t on the list because they won’t get any points. And some say Accelerated Reader has increased reading among students, who like collecting points and getting prizes. You can read the whole article here. If you are a teacher, I would be really curious to hear what you think about Accelerated Reader. Curious after reading the article, I looked up Shock Point. 7 points. So not as that Gossip Girl (8 pts), but better than Hamlet (7).

2 comments:

Mark Pennington said...

Following are short summaries of the most common arguments made by researchers, teachers, parents, and students as to why using AR is counterproductive. Hence, The 18 Reasons Not to Use Accelerated Reader:
http://penningtonpublishing.com/blog/reading/the-18-reasons-not-to-use-accelerated-reader/

Blues Greene said...

Just read an article in Rethinking Schools about this program. It's shocking. Who assigns these point values? I just looked at some of the title I've used in Honors English classes. How can a Nobel Prize winner like Toni Morrison, or a classic like Catcher in the Rye be given so few points?
Here's my answer: Testing is not teaching. This program is so ridiculously off the mark It's hard to believe anyone purporting to be a teacher would have anything to do with it. I'll stop here. (for now)I taught 33 years and now work as a teacher educator/writer. It's sad to think that we might be getting so far away fro truly educating students. Measurable bits of information are just that, they in no way reflect an educated person.